Accounting standards

In 1967, when every automaker was launching its own version of a “muscle car,” Mercury unveiled the Cougar, a sort of hybrid vehicle positioned between luxury sport and high performance, complete with 351-cubic-inch V-8 and a menacing grill that resembled a set of growling chromed teeth. My brother and I were instantly captivated by the car and begged my parents to get one. My father said our two-year-old Comet would do just fine, thank you, but he did point to an ad in a magazine that offered large model replicas of the Cougar at what seemed an unbelievable price of $2.75. We immediately clipped out the order form, emptied our banks and impatiently waited for the next five weeks until our packages arrived. You can probably guess the rest. In lieu of the flashy model pictured in the magazine, what came was actually a drab, olive-green car constructed of soft plastic, with no interior seats and with what appeared to be oversized roofing nails for axels. As I recall, my brother cried and I was thisclose to doing so as well. For once, my father spared us a Carrie Nation-like lecture and simply said, “You boys will find out you usually get what you pay for in life.” I often recall this adventure when the thorny issue of exorbitant executive pay comes up, and specifically how it measures up to company performance and the million-dollar question -- literally -- of do you really get what you pay for? No matter how well a company does with regard to appreciation in share prices and market capitalization, I somehow cannot justify or rationalize an executive compensation plan that is one hundred times the amount earned by the president of the United States. Along those lines, I recently was sent a copy of “Pay Dirt,” a review of executive compensation practices by proxy researcher Glass Lewis & Co. The Glass Lewis pay-for-performance study examined a total of six indicators of shareholder wealth and business performance, including such areas as changes in stock price over a two-year period and two-year changes in book value per share, as well as analyzing the chief executive’s total compensation and the top five executives’ total compensation. The study determined that a large number of companies shell out enormous salaries and perks to executives whose performances fell somewhere between mediocre and poor. Glass Lewis’ research identified 98 executives who were awarded more than $20 million in annual compensation in 2005, with media titan Barry Diller, chairman and CEO of IAC/InterActive Corp., banking the highest comp package in 2005 -- an estimated $85.1 million, a figure that doesn’t include roughly $290 million in exercised stock options. According to Glass Lewis, companies with the worst pay-for-performance result include advertising and media concern Interpublic Group of Cos., investment conglomerate Morgan Stanley, software publisher Ariba Inc. and Vitesse Semiconductor Corp. By contrast, the best ones were search engine Google Inc., Caterpillar Inc. and upscale retailer Nordstrom Inc. And four of last year’s 25 highest-paid chief executives were from companies now under government investigation over past stock-option-granting practices. And in a textbook example of executive logrolling, Glass Lewis unearthed five directors who sit on the compensation committees of at least two companies that received “F” grades in its pay-for-performance ratings for 2005, while two CEOs at companies that received F grades in pay-for-performance ratings for 2005 also sit on the boards of other companies that received Fs. Now, realistically, the Glass Lewis report won’t abolish the practice of absurd compensation packages for residents of the executive suite, But hopefully it will prompt investors to take a closer look at companies in which they have placed their money and demonstrate to the CEOs that their salary is not an annuity, and that they must either step up or step down. And for those that can’t measure up, you can throw in two 1967 Mercury Cougar replicas as part of the severance package.

In testimony before lawmakers, Securities and Exchange Commission chairman Christopher Cox defended the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, but sided with critics of the sweeping reform act who maintain that parts of the mandate need to be changed— in particular Section 404.

Nearly one year after the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 was passed into law, a study by information and research services provider LexisNexis found that Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings were 71 percent lower than over the same period for 2004.

Despite corporations gaining more experience with complying with the mandates of Sarbanes-Oxley, concerns over the burdens of its implementation have grown over the past several years.

The Securities and Exchange Commission's top accountant has added his thoughts on how to properly account for stock options in the historical financial statements of public companies.

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it has filed and settled financial fraud charges against bank holding company Doral Financial Corp.

Accounting for derivatives has never been easy, but the Governmental Accounting Standards Board has proffered some thoughts on how it might be done, and 85 concerned industry professionals generally agreed - but not completely.GASB project manager Randy Finden said that the bulk of the board's complex preliminary views document could be boiled down to two sentences: "Put all derivatives in the balance sheet at fair value. Fair-value changes will be reported as gains and losses in income, except for hedging gains and losses, which will be reported on the balance sheet as deferrals."

The selection by an entity of its company structure, its fiscal year and its method of accounting are the three main mechanisms that a company can employ in performing substantial tax planning, according to Nicholas Crocetti, CPA, a partner in CBiz Accounting Tax & Advisory."The concept of an accounting method is much broader than what many people believe," he said. "Most companies employ a number of accounting methods. First, they have an overall method of accounting - for example, the cash method, accrual or some form of hybrid method. Additionally, companies need accounting methods for every timing item they encounter in their business, such as how to account for inventory, bad debts, vacation pay and self-insured medical expenses."

A previous article discussed several of the new terms that the new risk assessment standards have introduced to the audit process (Sept. 4-17, 2006, page 36). The following discussion expands on that by addressing in more detail some of the more significant differences between the requirements of the new risk assessment standards and past audit practice.* Audit plans and programs. The audit program is now called the audit plan, but it is still required. The auditor must develop an audit plan in which the auditor documents the audit procedures to be used. The audit plan is more detailed than the audit strategy, and includes the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be performed, including risk assessment procedures and planned further audit procedures.

As part of the recently signed pension bill, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service will have to better define what constitutes "good" condition for donations of clothing or household items.The IRS can deny deductions for donated items such as furniture, appliances, linens or electronics if the items aren't in appropriate condition.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued a standard providing guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities.

Billionaire tycoon Ricardo Salinas Pliego and the Securities and Exchange Commission reached a settlement last week, marking the end of the first lawsuit against a foreign company under the corporate governance rules of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The newly released 2006-2007 Internal Revenue Service Priority Guidance Plan, designed as the agency's own blueprint for its guidance projects during the coming year, ranges in scope from consolidated returns to tax-exempt bonds.The Guidance Plan contains 10 more projects than last year's plan, and includes projected rulings on corporations and shareholders, employee benefits, executive compensation, excise taxes, exempt organizations, estate and gift taxes, partnerships, S corporations, and international issues.

A recently released exposure draft from the American Institute of CPAs contains two different interpretations under the institute's independence rules.

A new accounting bulletin from the Securities and Exchange Commission addresses how prior year misstatements should be considered when quantifying a current year's misstatement.

The AFL-CIO wants to know more about the role that the major accounting firms might have played in the handling of stock options grants the government is now investigating.

In a move to keep the United States ensconced as the financial capital of the world, a newly formed commission will recommend changes to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulatory mandates it judges to encumber domestic capital markets from remaining competitive.

The Employee Benefits Security Administration, part of the Labor Department, is seeking comment on its plans to update guidance on the independence of accountants who audit employee benefit plans.

The Canadian government has pledged $1 million over the next five years to the International Federation of Accountants' board that governs public company accounting.

The fact that the Securities and Exchange Commission last week filed a 46-page legal brief supporting the constitutionality of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to me was not as surprising as the fact they had to do it at all.