Tax strategies

The chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee has asked for information on the NCAA’s finances -- suggesting in the process that he might next be questioning the association to justify its tax-exempt status. "Most of the activities undertaken by educational organizations clearly further their (tax) exempt purpose," Rep. Bill Thomas, R-Calif., wrote in a letter to NCAA president Myles Brand. "The exempt purpose of intercollegiate athletics, however, is less apparent, particularly in the context of major college football and men's basketball programs." Specifically, Thomas asked for information on the NCAA’s television contract, the salaries of coaches, school sports facilities and total annual revenues and expenditures for Division I-A football programs and Division I basketball programs. He requested a response by the end of this month. Since 2004, the Ways and Means committee of Representatives has been conducting a broad review of the tax-exempt sector -- already looking into the tax-exempt status of nonprofit hospitals and credit unions among others. The NCAA's projected 2006-07 budget anticipates nearly $563 million in revenue, most from its TV contracts. More than half that figure is distributed to member leagues and schools, through student-athlete welfare, academic-enhancement and other programs. The remainder is paid according to the success of schools in the annual NCAA men's basketball tournament. Thomas notes in his letter that the annual returns filed by the NCAA with the IRS states that the primary purpose of the NCAA is to "maintain intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of the educational program and the athlete as an integral part of the student body,” and goes on to obliquely question college athletics' connection to higher education.

Loretta Doon was named chief executive of the California CPA Society and the CalCPA Education Foundation this May, after serving for just over a year as the chief operating officer for both groups.

Less than six months after announcing a plan to revamp its test for enrolled agents, the Internal Revenue Service said that the new version of the examination is ready. The first testing window opens today and runs through Dec. 1. The IRS contracted Thomson Prometric to redesign the test and stressed that experts within the Enrolled Agent community had played a role in shaping the new content that is included in the special enrollment examination. The exam has been reformatted from four sections, to three sections, in order to more accurately reflect the current state of taxpayer representation. Each of the three new sections -- individuals, businesses and representation, practice and procedures -- will contain about 100 questions. There are currently about 40,000 active enrolled agents, many of whom are attorneys and CPAs, and represent taxpayers in both examinations and collection matters. Other changes include that:

A “practice privilege” requirement introduced in Illinois -- which would have required out-of-state CPAs to register with a state agency -- appears on the verge of meeting a fate close to a similar proposal in California. That fate being, in this case, compromise. Both the Illinois CPA Society and the American Institute of CPAs had objected to the new registration requirement -- with the society requesting a delay to the law’s Oct. 1 effective date and the institute voicing its concerns over the “onerous” stipulation in a Sept. 28 letter to Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Contained in a broader piece of legislation that made changes to the regulation and licensing of CPAs in the state, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation would have required CPAs from other states to apply for temporary practice privilege or obtain full licensure as a CPA in the state of Illinois, regardless of whether the CPA or client ever entered the state. According to the AICPA, thousands of CPAs from across the country could have been impacted. On Sept. 29, the Illinois regulation department filed an emergency amendment, which read that out-of-state accountants would not have to follow the new requirement, “So long as the individual CPA is temporarily practicing in this state incidental to practice in another state and does not solicit Illinois clients nor have a physical presence in Illinois.” After much debate, a requirement that would have required out-of-state CPAs doing business in California to register with the state’s Board of Accountancy never made it out of committee this past June. Several taxpayer groups said that not requiring the registration could make it easier for accounting firms to market improper tax shelters without proper oversight. Proponents of the bill, including the state Board of Accountancy and the California CPA Society, said that their intention was merely to eliminate unnecessary red tape for neighboring accountants to provide basic services across state lines.

This week, the Tax Technical Corrections Act of 2006 was introduced in both houses of Congress. The legislation will essentially serve to cross the T’s and dot the I’s to several pieces of already-enacted legislation, clarifying definitions and refining certain timelines. Ways & Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., sponsored the bill in the House, while Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and ranking member Max Baucus, D-Mont., did the same in the Senate. Among others, the bill would make changes to:

A $39.5 million settlement between PricewaterhouseCoopers and investors in a mortgage loan fund is a done deal, now that the California Supreme Court has officially dismissed the original filing. The state’s highest court had agreed to hear the case back in March, just days before the plaintiffs reached a settlement after agreeing to mediation with the Big Four firm. That settlement has since received approval from both a federal bankruptcy court as well as the Alameda County Superior Court. Both sides requested a dismissal of the case in early September. The plaintiffs sued PwC in 2002, accusing the firm of abetting a fraudulent scheme carried out by then general partner, James Hillman, of two partnerships in which they had invested. Hillman and the director of the mortgage fund were sued in 2001 by the Securities and Exchange Commission. According to court filings, PwC audited the financial statements of the two partnerships in 1999, but ended its audit after telling Hillman he had given the firm falsified audit reports. The case itself had questioned whether PwC was required to inform investors of the fraudulent scheme. The money will go into a fund established under a global settlement agreement reached in federal court in 2002, and be distributed to plaintiffs.

BNA Daily Tax Report recently reported that a California Franchise Tax Board employee disclosed confidential information about the Board’s audits of over 200 corporations. What was most interesting was the method of disclosure. It seems the employee accidentally e-mailed the information to a distribution list of members of the news media, including two BNA reporters. According to BNA, the e-mail identified a number of corporate taxpayers under audit for tax years 2003 and earlier. The names of the corporations, their identification numbers, and the auditor assigned to each case were identified. Notes indicated that several are being audited for possible participation in abusive tax shelters. An FTB spokeswoman told BNA that the employee intended to send the message to himself, but accidentally sent the message to a distribution list that included members of the news media who cover tax issues. This gaffe illustrates that hacking isn’t the only danger to be worried about in this technology age. A simple oversight when selecting a recipient of the e-mail can instantaneously broadcast confidential information to the outside world. There are many possibilities for e-mail causing problems that simply didn’t exist in the strictly paper world. For example, at my company years ago, an individual wrote a blistering e-mail intended to tell his boss that he deserved a substantial raise, detailing all he had done, criticizing the company, and listing his current salary and salary demands. By mistake, he inadvertently sent out the e-mail to an address that included all the employees in the company whose last name began with A through M. There are other more common instances, such as when you get an e-mail and compose a critical follow-up of the e-mail that you want to send to a fellow employee and you end up mistakenly sending the follow-up to the original sender of the e-mail because you hit “Reply” by mistake, rather than “Forward.” Technology is wonderful, but it is important to understand that it also means a need for an increased awareness, and that added safeguards must be put in place. It is scary that what in the paper age was difficult to do now can be done by a simple inadvertent touch of a keyboard. P.S.: Please let me know if you have special e-mail safeguards in place at your firm.

The Internal Revenue Service has launched its much-anticipated Income Verification Express Service or IVES, a program offering immediate electronic delivery of client tax and income information to financial lenders such as mortgage companies.

Just one week after the Treasury Department released a report on its strategy for closing the $300 billion tax gap, the ranking minority member of the Senate Finance Committee labeled the plan “incomplete” and not credible.Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., said he would continue to hold up the nomination of Eric Solomon as the assistant Treasury secretary for tax policy.

Several more 2007 Toyota models have been certified by the Internal Revenue Service to qualify for the hybrid tax credit enacted by the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

Tax software publisher CCH continued making an aggressive push into the small practitioner market, announcing its second major acquisition in as many months.The Wolters Kluwer business, which produces the ProSystem fx Office line of accounting and business software products, signaled its determination to take on the marketplace leader, Intuit Inc.'s QuickBooks, by striking a pact to purchase TaxWise Corp.

Although the program has been characterized by the Internal Revenue Service itself as potentially rampant with opportunities for scamming, and has attracted growing opposition, the agency nonetheless has moved forward with its plan to hire private debt collectors to track down delinquent taxpayers.The first phase, rolled out in September, enlisted a trio of private collection agencies to receive personal information about taxpayers with outstanding liabilities, including name and Social Security number of taxpayer (and spouse, if a joint tax liability), address, amount of tax debt and the year or years to which the debt applies.

Tax advisors are likely to hear from potential clients seeking advice on how to "re-enter" our tax reporting system.The reasons for failing to file tax returns vary with the client: the stress of a divorce or bankruptcy, ignorance of U.S. tax laws, or willful negligence. Similarly, the strategies for handling these cases should vary, considering the potential criminal, as well as civil, ramifications of a client's failure to file timely returns.

The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel has sent the Internal Revenue Service recommendations for easing taxpayer burdens in five areas.In a 12-page report dated Aug. 18, the panel made the following suggestions:

To divine the true meaning of a gap, I usually need to go beyond calculating the difference between my gross pay and net pay on the 15th and 30th of each month.That my friends, is Webster’s unabridged definition of a gap.

The share of income taxes paid by the top half of taxpayers reached its highest level in decades according to a report from the Joint Economic Committee.

The threat by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., to hold back the appointment of Eric Solomon as assistant secretary for tax policy at the Department of the Treasury is misplaced, according to observers.Baucus, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, said that he would place a hold on President George W. Bush's nominee for the Treasury's top tax position unless the department details how it will close the tax gap.

A sampling of tax returns filed by fishermen in 2004 revealed that thousands of workers had overpaid an average of $530, after failing to take advantage of the averaging provision in calculating their income tax liability. According to the report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, more than 4,600 taxpayers -- about 90 percent of the fishermen who could have benefited from the averaging provision -- didn't take advantage of the provision included the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. TIGTA said that the overpaid taxes for the individual returns filed during the 2004 tax year totaled more than $2.4 million; and a startling 90 percent of the fishermen’s returns were prepared by paid tax preparers. The 2004 law allows fishermen to elect to compute their tax liabilities by averaging all, or a portion, of their taxable fishing income from the prior three years. The measure was designed to help fishermen recover from low-income years by keeping more of their income in successful years and offsetting potentially high tax burdens in isolated years. At the time of its enactment, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the provision could save fishermen up to $61 million in taxes over the next decade -- between $3 million and $10 million annually. During a prior audit, TIGTA noted that less than one half of taxpayers who could benefit from a similar provision for farmers, had actually taken advantage of the measure. The inspector general recommended to a variety of federal offices that a better and broader effort be made to educate both fishermen and tax preparers about the averaging provision. The full report is available at www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2006reports/200630158fr.pdf.

The Internal Revenue Service has issued details on the process for military reservists called to active duty to receive payments from individual retirement accounts, 401(k) plans and 403(b) tax-sheltered annuities, without penalities.

Two months after a senator said he would hold up Treasury appointments until the department provided a comprehensive plan to close the tax gap, the Treasury Department has issued a report titled, “A Comprehensive Strategy for Reducing the Tax Gap.”